Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:45

Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Moving sucks, but decluttering helps - The Verge
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
AI identifies key gene sets that cause complex diseases - Medical Xpress
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Procter & Gamble says it will cut 7,000 jobs over the next 2 years - CBS News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Who was the most ignorant American you have ever met?
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Powerful solar telescope unveils ultra-fine magnetic 'curtains' on the sun's surface - Space
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Love Island Cast Member Leaves the Villa on Day Two - Vulture